Bareback porn can be a safer way for those watching to indulge in their sexual fantasies, because watching bareback porn usually goes hand in hand with masturbation and not actually having unprotected anal sex. For a number of men, watching bareback porn is as close to bareback sex as they get. Some men enjoy the concept of barebacking, but are concerned about the health risks associated with not using a condom, including HIV and other Sexually Transmitted Infections (STI’s), also known as Sexually Transmitted Diseases (STD’s).
Of course the health risks increase when viewers of bareback porn actually engage in bareback sex themselves, which many of us do. But what about the risks the models performing in bareback sex films take when they engage in anal sex without a condom with another porn actor? There are certainly risks associated with this, so I thought I would examine the subject further, because often we do not think about the health aspects of barebacking when we are watching bareback porn.
Before I continue, I would like to say that I am not a doctor, health care professional and I do not work in a similar field. I do however, find sexual health an interesting subject. I am writing this article using research I have discovered along the way, so I would like to point out that if my information sources are inaccurate, then what I am saying may not be totally correct, but I am using various sources to improve the quality of this article.
Producers of bareback porn flicks vary when it comes to health standards and testing procedures. Some producers test models before each filming to ensure that their models are HIV negative and they only work with HIV negative models. Other studios may test before each filming, but pair models up with other models of the same HIV status and this is called sero-sorting. Some studios may not test at all and may ask the models to sign a release form stating that they are aware of the risks with HIV and other Sexually Transmitted Infections.
As testing requirements can vary between producers and because some models may rely on what they are told about the sexual health of the other models they are about to have unprotected sex with, this can sometimes be a Russian roulette kind of situation, because an HIV negative model may accidentally be paired up with an HIV positive model and seroconversion may result. Some models may be prepared to take the risk and chance their health.
Sometimes even when extreme care is taken, an HIV negative model may still become HIV positive and this could be due to various factors. If a porn production company tests all of their models and if they use the Elisa (Enzyme-linked Immunosorbent Assay) test as their preferred method of testing, then there is a window period before the HIV may show up and this can be up to three months and even up to six months with some people. This means that a recently HIV infected model may have a negative HIV test result, which may increase the level of confidence with those involved thinking it is relatively safe. Unfortunately, this can be where the level of safety is impaired and the test may give a false level of security.
There is a more expensive HIV test called the PCR (Polymerase Chain Reaction) test where the window period of infection is significantly reduced, meaning that the results are more accurate. This would be a better option for all concerned, however, due to the higher costs involved with this testing method, it may not be a popular choice. Models who engage in unprotected sex should be given as much information as possible about sexual health and the testing methods available.
There is a significant amount information available relating to bareback sex and sexual health, but some of this information may be confusing to some and the outcome can be that a HIV negative model can end up becoming HIV positive. I would encourage any model who wishes to participate in bareback sex films to research HIV and other Sexually Transmitted Infections before participating in unprotected sex and becoming a bareback porn model. I will cover more sexual health articles in the future, as I feel that this is an important balance needed in the world of bareback sex.
Further resources relating to bareback sex and sexual health can be found by clicking here.





September 19th, 2008 at 7:52 am
I agree with you 100%. However, those engaging in bareback sex know the risks, or should. Even playing safe, there is a chance you could get an STD, even HIV. And I know I’m going to get backlash on this, but, anybody that has sex with another person, safe or bareback, knows these risks, and should be willing to either accept them before fucking around, or not accept them and just jerk off. If you get HIV or some other STD, unless you were raped, you really really have no one to blame but yourself (Not that the other guy isn’t at fault if he knows he’s HIV positive, but you knew the risk before you fucked around with him).
September 19th, 2008 at 2:44 pm
Thanks for this article. I especially like your first point — that for many men, WATCHING bareback is as far as they go.
But for guys who do have raw sex, I want to let you know about the research around a new prevention technology.
Currently in development, a microbicide is a cream or gel, or maybe a douche or an enema, that could be used to reduce a person’s risk of HIV infection vaginally or rectally.
Rectal microbicides could offer both primary protection in the absence of condoms and back-up protection if a condom breaks or slips off during anal intercourse.
For those unable or unwilling to use condoms, for guys who like bareback, raw sex, rectal microbicides could be a safe and effective alternative means of reducing risk, especially if they were unobtrusive and/or enhanced sexual pleasure enough to motivate consistent use.
Such alternatives are essential if we are to address the full spectrum of prevalent sexual practices and the basic human need for accessible, user-controlled HIV and STD prevention tools.
If you are interested in learning more, please check out the website for IRMA - International Rectal Microbicide Advocates - http://www.rectalmicrobicides.org
Thanks!
Jim